Welcome to International Engineering Journal ~ Store

IENGJ Store sells books, monographs and IENGJ magazines.

International Engineering Journal ~ Store

Reviewers Guide

Sample image

Make sure the article you have been asked to review truly matches your expertise

The Editor who has approached you may not know your work intimately, and may only be aware of your work in a broader context. Only accept an invitation if you are competent to review the article.

 

Title
Does it clearly describe the article?

Abstract

Does it reflect the content of the article?

Introduction

Does it describe what the author hoped to achieve accurately, and clearly state the problem being investigated? Normally, the introduction should summarize relevant research to provide context, and explain what other authors' findings, if any, are being challenged or extended. It should describe the experiment, the hypothesis (es) and the general experimental design or method.

Methods
Does the author accurately explain how the data was collected? Is the design suitable for answering the question posed? Is there sufficient information present for you to replicate the research? Does the article identify the procedures followed? Are these ordered in a meaningful way? If the methods are new, are they explained in detail? Was the sampling appropriate? Have the equipment and materials been adequately described? Does the article make it clear what type of data was recorded; has the author been precise in describing measurements?

Results
This is where the author(s) should explain in words what he/she/they discovered in the research. It should be clearly laid out and in a logical sequence. You will need to consider if the appropriate analysis has been conducted. Are the statistics correct? If you are not comfortable with statistics, please advise the editor when you submit your report. Interpretation of results should not be included in this section.

Conclusions and/or Discussion

Are the claims in this section supported by the results, do they seem reasonable? Have the authors indicated how the results relate to expectations and to earlier research? Does the article support or contradict previous theories? Does the conclusion explain how the research has moved the body of scientific knowledge forward?

Use of Language

If an article is poorly written due to grammatical errors, while it may make it more difficult to understand the science, you do not need to correct the English. You should bring this to the attention of the editor.

 

Previous Works

 

If the article builds upon previous research, does it reference that work appropriately? Are there any important works that have been omitted? Are the references accurate?


Header-one-lorem-emphasised

6 YEARS AGO  |  Super User
Header-one-lorem-emphasised

Lacinia quis diam dui felis cursus tempor eleifend sed pretium odio. Mauris sit Lacinia quis diam dui felis cu...

Read more

Mauris sit Lacinia quis diam

6 YEARS AGO  |  Super User
Mauris sit Lacinia quis diam

Lacinia quis diam dui felis cursus tempor eleifend sed pretium odio. Mauris sit Lacinia quis diam dui felis cu...

Read more

Nisl in Pellentesque mauris

6 YEARS AGO  |  Super User
Nisl in Pellentesque mauris

Lacinia quis diam dui felis cursus tempor eleifend sed pretium odio. Mauris sit Lacinia quis diam dui felis cu...

Read more

 
 
You are here: Home IENGJ Category Reviewers Guide

What is IENGJ ?

The International Engineering Journal (IENGJ) seeks high quality, original papers that contribute

to the methodology and practice of the twelve areas of engineering:

More info...

Up Coming Events